![]() ![]() And we're trying really hard not to forget.ģ.3v Pin Reset Directions :D / Alt Imgur link Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Timetm). government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data - legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. It walks the directory tree twice, once to measure it, and the second time to print out the paths to 20 "random" bytes under the directory.We are digital librarians. Here is a tiny app that uses deep sampling to find tumors in any disk or directory. If you do have quotas, you can use quota -v Is even more accurate (no < 1GB directories will be listed). If you have too many little directories showing up in your output, adjust your regex accordingly. I incorporated the suggestion, which does make it better, but there are still false positives, so there are just tradeoffs (simpler expr, worse results more complex and longer expr, better results). This will take you some time, but unless you have quotas set up, I think that's just the way it's going to be.Īs points out in the comments, the expression can get more precise if you're finding too many false positives. Unless you've got really small partitions, grepping for directories in the gigabytes is a pretty good filter for what you want. Use df to find the partition that's hurting you, and then try du commands.īecause it prints sizes in "human readable form".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |